Is Repair Possible For Rusted Out Areas Where Coil Springs Go On Saturn Vue

Rear Pause Shock Absorber problem is a common vehicle trouble that happens to near motorcar brands and models. The following is a sample list of Rear Suspension Daze Cushion problems reported in near pop vehicles.

Rear Pause Shock Absorber problem of Chevrolet 1500

The vehicle was a 2000 Chevrolet 1500. During a scheduled maint. /repair visit at a major chevy dealership, they advised the shock absorbers couldn't be replaced; the upper mounts for both rear shocks were gone. The dealer suggested I take the truck to an machine torso store for the needed restoration work, then return. I later inspected the undercarriage of my truck and found extensive rot and rust on major frame structures. Both upper shock mounts announced to have rotted away. Both frame spreader tubes, to which the upper shock mounts and the rear fuel tank back up strap are attached, accept lost near of their structural integrity. I as well noted most main fastener bolts announced to have lost their structural integrity,due to rot and rust. In Dec of 2009, I replaced the fuel straps. One brake line failed (rotted open), causing brake loss, equally I was parting the service visit. All the brake lines had deteriorated to the bespeak that replacement was necessary. In July of 2022, I had to supersede the rear rotted out bumper. I am now seeing rot and rust breaking through the front bumper of my truck. In light of the major rust and structural failures I take experienced recently, I started researching NHTSA'southward data base to meet if others were experiencing these issues with their silverado, or if this was an anomaly. I was quite startled to find numerous reports being cited for identical bug and failures for this vehicle. Ii issues business concern starting time, major rust & rot has been reported on this model and after ones for over a menses of 10-13 years. Second, practise, or should service shops have a responsibility to suggest when signs of major deterioration occur, so we tin can make repair/investment choices? I've owned several trucks, keep them for 8-x years, then replace them. I've seen surface rust over the years, but not this kind of frame/undercarriage deterioration over a relatively short truck life. It was Jul. 8, 2022 when this rear pause stupor absorber issue occurred.

See all problems of Chevrolet 1500 and all Rear Pause Shock Absorber problems of Chevrolet 1500.

Rear Suspension Daze Cushion trouble of Chevrolet Aveo

The car is a 2010 Chevrolet Aveo. I was driving on the highway when the engine light came on. The vehicle ran for a few minutes before it started losing power and chugging along on the highway. When I pulled off, I had to palpitate on the gas to proceed the machine from stalling at the terminate sign. To make it dwelling house on the back roads, I did not stop at stop signs for fright of the car stalling, I had the gas pedal to the floor and it was only going approximately ten mph. I did not bulldoze it to the dealership, it was towed. They institute several engine control module updates. Reflashed ecm code s47490d. Performed entrada 11290 spark plugs and boot. While at dealership, tech found rear shocks were leaking. E5807 - rear daze absorbers replaced, both sides. The failure engagement was Thursday, May 31, 2022.

Encounter all bug of Chevrolet Aveo and all Rear Pause Shock Absorber problems of Chevrolet Aveo.

Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problem of Chrysler Sebring

The vehicle involved was a 2002 Chrysler Sebring. Right rear superlative strut mount became noisy/creaking/thumps) during the winter. 2 weeks agone while driving habitation we heard excessive dissonance/creaking/thumping from right rear. While driving to work the side by side day racket was even louder. Upon inspection I constitute the shock had dropped through the mount and were wedged in the coil. Temporarily pushed information technology back up, purchased a new mount from dealer which was installed. Old mount, aluminum), had completely deteriorated. At present the left side was getting louder. Will supersede before stupor damage as well. This rear suspension shock absorber problem happened on 06/01/07.

See all problems of Chrysler Sebring and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Chrysler Sebring.

Rear Suspension Stupor Cushion problem of Contrivance Ram 2500

The reporting person'due south vehicle is a 2003 Dodge Ram 2500 tdi. The contact stated that while driving 65 mph, the vehicle started to shake violently and without alert. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic, who replaced the shock absorbers and steering damper. The remedy failed to repair the failure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was fourscore,000 and the current mileage was 85,000. Updated 3/12/cn updated 03/21/14. This outcome happened on Wednesday, Apr ten, 2022.

Meet all bug of Dodge Ram 2500 and all Rear Suspension Shock Cushion bug of Dodge Ram 2500.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Dodge Stratus

The car is a 2004 Dodge Stratus. Driving over a small bump in the route, the car rear suspension made a clanging racket. Upon investigation, the left rear shock absorber top mount is cleaved, and the shock is loose and rattling, not performing its office to stabilizer the vehicle over standard road conditions. Loss of suspension during braking maneuver on wet roads could lead to an accident from loss of control of vehicle. This rear suspension daze cushion issue occurred October 6, 2022.

See all problems of Dodge Stratus and all Rear Intermission Shock Absorber problems of Dodge Stratus.

Rear Break Shock Absorber trouble of Ford F-250

Tl - the reporting person'south vehicle is a 2009 Ford F-250. The contact stated that the forepart end of the vehicle would milkshake violently whenever driving over a road bump or a pothole. The vehicle was taken to a dealer where it was diagnosed that the steering stabilizer, the shock absorbers, and the track bar bushings needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was not notified of the failure. The vehicle was repaired but the failure was not rectified. The approximate failure mileage was lx,000 and the electric current mileage was 73,000. Dr. The failure appointment was 05/15/2013.

Come across all problems of Ford F-250 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber bug of Ford F-250.

Rear Break Daze Absorber problem of Ford Escape

The car involved is a 2004 Ford Escape. The vehicle'due south vehicle identification number (VIN) is 1FMCU94104_. Correct rear break shock cushion mount detatched and pushed through body of vehicle. Vehicle at present is unstable and unsafe. This rear suspension shock cushion issue occurred Sat., May. iii, 2022.

Come across all problems of Ford Escape and all Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problems of Ford Escape.

Rear Interruption Shock Absorber problem of GMC Sierra

The machine is a 2006 GMC Sierra. The VIN of the problem Sierra is 2GTEC13V86_. : the contact stated while traveling various speeds, the vehicle bounced uncontrollably when hit a rut in the road. The vehicle was taken to the dealership, who determined bigger shocks needed to be installed. Updated 10/17/2006 -. This rear pause daze absorber trouble happened on September 27, 2006.

See all problems of GMC Sierra and all Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problems of GMC Sierra.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion problem of GMC Sierra

The automobile involved is a 1999 GMC Sierra. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this GMC Sierra is 2GTEC19T4X_. Vehicle vibrates severely at speeds above 55. Vehicle shakes when brakes are applied. Dealer has advised potential issues with front hubs, rear shocks, wheels and tires. Vehicle has been to dealer iii (three) times since 08-25-99 for diagnosis and repair of problem, merely as of 09-x-99, the trouble of overall major vibration hasn't been resolved. This consequence happened on Wednesday, Baronial 25, 1999.

Run into all problems of GMC Sierra and all Rear Break Shock Absorber issues of GMC Sierra.

Rear Suspension Daze Cushion problem of Acura RSX

The vehicle was a 2006 Acura Rsx. The VIN of this vehicle is JH4DC53006_. Purchased the car in October 2005. Began to observe a popping audio from the right front end of the car in depression speed turns. Took in to be checked November nine 2005 with 901 miles on the motorcar. Dealer replaced correct front strut assembly, daze cushion/damper popping sound from the right front of the motorcar in depression speed turns returned it now also occurred when accelerating and stopping, and was much louder. Took in to be checked March 6 2006 with 2300 miles on the motorcar. Dealer installed damper mounting base of operations and/or begetting and/or spring seat. Dealer besides installed "silencer tubes" on the intermission. Installation of the silencer tubes is an unacceptable "set up. " this clearly indicates that the dealer knows the problem will return and wants just to cover up the symptom. This rear pause daze absorber problem happened on Wednesday, Nov. ix, 2005.

See all bug of Acura RSX and all Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problems of Acura RSX.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber trouble of Acura RSX

The car involved was a 2002 Acura Rsx. The VIN of this Rsx is JH4DC54862_. Dealer said that right rear strut was shot and needed to be replaced. Pregnant rattle was coming from the right rear portion of the vehicle. Vehicle merely had less than 200 miles when failure occured. They are ordering new function and will install under warranty. Was told they take seen a couple of other new vehicles where this has happened. This issue happened on 06/20/2002.

Run into all problems of Acura RSX and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Acura RSX.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Honda Civic

The motorcar involved is a 2007 Honda Civic. Popping noise while turning at 5,268 miles. Replaced two tires at 19,785 miles. Need a front end end axle replacement at 31,839. Diagnosed and adjusted torqued rear intermission dissonance at 60,136. Replaced rear upper control artillery 61,275. Replaced shocks, and cv boots at 61,275. Struts were making racket due to cupping. Struts were replaced at 61,275. Two new tires that were recently replaced were replaced over again. Both tires were feathered and making racket. Vehicle is maintained in good condition and is following the manufacturer's maintenance recommendation. Car was aligned as required past manufacturer. However, cupping or feathering of the tires still happened. When the rear command arm was non replaced yet, the rear dissonance was so loud and driving was bad. The tires felt apartment and the shock absorber did not seem to exist working. It is very hard to deal with both Honda America and kolbe dealer. Both companies tried to play ignorant of the issues although they knew information technology all forth. I spent $1,419. xi for premature expenses. American Honda blamed the premature damages to me. American Honda nor kolbe Honda did not notify me of the technical bulletins that were issued. Also, simply because there is a technical bulletin or corrective activity does not hateful that the problem will go away. Design of the rear upper command arm must be reviewed once again and tested for geometry with other parts of the vehicle. Honda America should tightened its quality command and quality assurance so that its manufacturing facility will not release cars that have defective parts. Honda knew very well that the rear upper control arms have pattern flawed starting with 2002 Honda Civic. Why are they still using this design? is it because they manufactured so much of the incorrect parts?. This rear break shock absorber problem happened on Sep. 8, 2009.

See all problems of Honda Civic and all Rear Suspension Shock Cushion bug of Honda Civic.

Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber trouble of Honda Odyssey

The vehicle having this issue was a 2022 Honda Odyssey. Vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle is 5FNRL5H63B_. A loose rattling sound began to get much more pronounced and louder coming from the rear rider area. I determined it wasnt a loose/unlatched door, took the auto to the dealer. Upon inspection they found that the rear daze absorber had lost all of its fluid, reducing its performance to well-nigh 0%. If this had occured on a long trip (apporx 200-400 miles, the amount covered in well-nigh a week) this lack of cycle control could have been disastrous. This loud rattling masked another similar problem with the drivers side front strut; this is an even greater safety issue concerning controlling the car. Both strut and shock were replaced past the dealer. A less perceptive or attentive driver might have missed these telltale indicators of some part failure, which could atomic number 82 to loss of control of the vehicle. . This problem occurred on Wed., Dec. 28, 2022.

Encounter all problems of Honda Odyssey and all Rear Intermission Daze Absorber problems of Honda Odyssey.

Rear Suspension Daze Cushion problem of Hyundai Santa Fe

The vehicle having this outcome was a 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe. Please acquit an investigation into numerous complaints regarding premature tire wear, suspension and steering in 2007 Santa Fe. I think they are connected and affect each otherby poor pattern or manufacturing procedure. Purchased every bit new vehicle in 12/2007. Noticed wobble in steering wheel a dissimilar speeds, conditions at 3k miles. Dealer found naught wrong. Noticed rattle and klunking dissonance in left front when driving on uneven pavement at 12k miles. No dealer or mechanic could diagnose anything wrong. Replaced all 4 tires at 26k because front right tire worn to chugalug on within. All wheels aligned at same time. Nevertheless had wobble, vibration at dissimilar speeds, accelerating, benumbed, etc. Numerous balancing and rotations. Mechanic could not find annihilation wrong. At 31k, replaced sway bars and links, had wheels bearings serviced. Still wobbling, rattle in forepart stop and uneven steering. At 32k, had bicycle bearings repacked, another forepart end alignment, and all wheels,tires recalibrated to Hyundai specifications. Vehicle collection perfectly. . . For 3 days. All rattles, noises, wobbles, uneven steering bug returned. Going back to dealer 3rd time in 1 month. Rattle and wobble gets worse everyday. Don't feel safe driving this vehicle. I bulldoze 15 miles to and from work on minor thruway in austin, TX. No off roading, no pulling any trailers. Only hail damage to outside. No front end end collisions, engine issues or break harm before these problems were noticed. (small collision at 30,500k. I was at end, driver in back rear-ended me at 5mph. My forepart end tapped car in front end of me. Dealer body store replaced forepart bumper "shock absorbers. No damage to frame or suspension. Is this a subframe problem, beam assembly issue or what? lots of comments/complaints on internet regarding problems like this. Again, I practice non feel safe driving this auto any further than to and from work. Cannot afford to trade in, buy unlike vehicle. . This rear suspension daze absorber problem happened on Mar. 28, 2008.

See all issues of Hyundai Santa Fe and all Rear Interruption Shock Absorber issues of Hyundai Santa Fe.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Hyundai XG350

The vehicle having this issue was a 2002 Hyundai Xg350. Vehicle identification number (VIN) of the vehicle is KMHFU45E72_. : the contact stated that when the vehicle hit a bump, the engine audibly moved up and down within the engine compartment. The vehicle was taken to a service dealer, where the dealer determined that the engine mounts were weak and needed to exist replaced. Updated viii/xiv/2006 - the vehicles shock absorbers had to be replaced. The consumer believes the engine mountain repair and shock absorbers should have been covered nether the vehicle's warranty. This upshot happened on Wednesday, Jul. 19, 2006.

See all problems of Hyundai XG350 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber bug of Hyundai XG350.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Infiniti QX4

The car is a 1997 Infiniti Qx4. The VIN of the car is JNRAR05Y4V_. 1997 Qx4. Consumer writes in regards to recall observe concerning malfunctioning parts the consumer stated the recalled function caused other mechanical problems to other components on the vehicle. It caused the tires to prematurely clothing out, due to the shock absorbers being over-worked, and information technology acquired bug with the steering besides. The consumer stated the dealership did not perform a thorough job in fixing the trouble, equally the vehicle is still dangerous to drive. Recall # 11v244000. This rear suspension shock absorber issue occurred Saturday, September 1, 2022.

See all problems of Infiniti QX4 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Infiniti QX4.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Infiniti QX4

The reporting person'southward vehicle is a 2003 Infiniti Qx4. While driving approximately twoscore mph, the contact heard a loud banging noise outside the vehicle and all of a sudden the vehicle began to lean towards the driver's side. The contact maneuvered to the side of the road to inspect the vehicle and then resumed with circumspection. The vehicle was taken to a repair shop where they informed that the frame was severely rusted; and the front driver side strut tower fractured due to excessive corrosion. The technician also stated that the failure would eventually touch on the steering. The contact planned to have the vehicle repaired. There was an open investigation associated with NHTSA action number pe11004 (suspension: forepart: daze absorber). The failure mileage was 149,000. Updated 03/22/lj. The failure engagement was January. 7, 2022.

Run into all issues of Infiniti QX4 and all Rear Pause Shock Absorber bug of Infiniti QX4.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion problem of Jeep Grand Cherokee

The vehicle was a 2022 Jeep 1000 Cherokee. VIN of the vehicle was 1C4RJEBTXC_. My car makes a terrible noise on suspension, showtime started on the back of the car, I`ve send it to a local Jeep dealer to repair it on warranty and after 4 visits they change my shock absorbers (rear), correct subsequently that, the racket disappeared for a couple of days and return again, I went again to the dealer, they refused to change information technology again and set up a meeting with Jeep local warranty manager in pr, their representative drove the machine along with me, heard the racket and said, at that place was nothing they could do, considering this was a problem with all Jeep cars from that year (2012) and at that place was no way to fix it (it might take a recall someday) but I should keep it that way since there were no take chances. Then he authorized (after I insist) to alter it again the daze absorbers (rear), this time the dissonance was gone for 2 weeks and came back once more. The dissonance returned again louder, it seems my front and back wheels are loose and I hear a racket on the forepart of the car (and felt on the steering wheel like something was loose) every time I hit the brakes. On Apr-2014 I called again Jeep representative in pr and explained all that was happening, he then set upwards another service on Chrysler/Jeep dealer puerto rico and on 04/21/2014 the dealer representative took my car for repair and said they changed again the daze absorbers (rear) for the tertiary time and as well changed another piece to fix the front noise. Over again for 2 weeks the rear noise disappeared and at present returned louder and also on the front end of the car makes a snap noise every time I start the car and sometimes when I make turns (left and right). My warranty expires on 28/Feb/2015 and it seems Chrysler/Jeep is just pushing it until I hit this engagement and no longer be responsible for the repair. I`m afraid for my family`s security since we use this machine on daily footing on freeways here in pr for our commute. This problem occurred on October. 7, 2022.

Come across all problems of Jeep Grand Cherokee and all Rear Suspension Daze Absorber problems of Jeep K Cherokee.

Rear Suspension Daze Absorber problem of Jeep Wrangler

The vehicle involved was a 2008 Jeep Wrangler. At 65 mph after hitting a couple of normal bumps where bridge surface meets the interstate, the front shook so violently that information technology felt like body would separate from the frame. This is no subtle "shimmy or vibration" it makes yous jump on the brakes and hope that the 18 wheeler behind you does not run over y'all. I think the eye lane could exist deadly when it occurs, because you can not notice the berm fast enough. It goes away until the adjacent time. Had steering stabilizer up sized, just to no avail. It has happened twice on highway since beginning incident. Information technology is just a matter of fourth dimension until we hear about fatalities. I am looking into larger stupor absorbers every bit my mechanic says they are probably under sized for the tires. I am grateful my daughter was not driving information technology at the time. As a retired fireman information technology takes a lot to print me when it comes to unsafe situations. This is going to kill someone if it has non already taken lives. It was 01/24/2013 when this rear intermission shock absorber issue happened.

See all problems of Jeep Wrangler and all Rear Pause Daze Cushion problems of Jeep Wrangler.

Rear Interruption Shock Absorber problem of Mazda Tribute

The car is a 2004 Mazda Tribute. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was 4F2YZ94114_. Wife left house to run an errand and returned immediately after hearing loud clanging noise in rear of car. She brought to my attention so I rode in the rear seat to observe as she collection. After only a very brusk distance I heard the noise and observed that I could see through the rear speaker area to the exterior. She parked the motorcar and I looked from the exterior into the right (passenger) rear wheel well and saw the entire upper shock mount was rotted out offering no support whatever to the stupor absorber. The overall condition of the car is very good with no or very little body rust. It is my opinion that the cannot be driven until this is repaired. I am not a certified mechanic but I do restore old cars as a hobby and consider myself to be of moderate ability in auto mechanics. Information technology was Nov. 10, 2022 when this rear suspension daze cushion effect occurred.

See all problems of Mazda Tribute and all Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problems of Mazda Tribute.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Mazda Tribute

The motorcar was a 2003 Mazda Tribute. I own an 2003 ES 4x4; during my last two scheduled maintenance inspections I noticed the rear shocks started leaking. They accept been replaced twice and are getting fix to be replaced once more. We don't go off road with this vehicle then the only matter I could think is that the mill motorcraft parts are defective or not properly matched to this vehicle. If you come across an oily residue on your shocks they need to be replaced due to leakage. This event happened on Friday, April 22, 2005.

See all bug of Mazda Tribute and all Rear Intermission Daze Cushion bug of Mazda Tribute.

Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problem of Mercedes Benz E500

The vehicle having this upshot was a 2004 Mercedes Benz E500. Alarm message: [cease, auto too low] appeared in the information center. Walked around the vehicle checking all wheels. Discovered the forepart left side noticeably lower than forepart right side and the wheel almost touching the plastic liner under the bike well. Checked fuses. Pressed "raise" and ads buttons but it didn't remedy this problem. Possible defective hydropneumatic daze absorber. This outcome happened on Wednesday, November 20, 2022.

Encounter all problems of Mercedes Benz E500 and all Rear Suspension Daze Cushion bug of Mercedes Benz E500.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Mercedes Benz 420

The vehicle is a 1997 Mercedes Benz 420. I am a victim of a unsafe condom design flaw in my 1997 Mercedes Benz e420. Terminal calendar week, my wife was driving the car in a directly line on a local street most our habitation, when the passenger side whorl spring flew out of the machine, resulting in her completely losing control of the vehicle. At that place were no warning signs - no sounds, rattles, etc. Luckily, she was driving at a wearisome speed of 35mph and that the cars around her stopped, allowing her to maneuver the car to the shoulder of the road. Equally a upshot, she avoided any blow and was not hurt. The coil springs back up the full weight of the car, and when the spring flew out of the car, the motorcar complanate onto the tire under its ain weight. The bicycle well rested on the tire and supported the entire weight of the motorcar. The motorcar began making a loud noise every bit a effect of the cycle well rubbing against the tire and came to an firsthand halt. My wife could non steer the car left or right, since the wheel well prevented the tire from making such turns. When she forced a turn and so that she could pull over to the shoulder, the motorcar jumped equally the cycle exited the bike well and rode on its edge. The bike well scored deep gashes in the tire. The coil spring dented the cycle well, the wheel and the shock cushion. When you lot lose such command of the car, y'all tin can very easily exist involved in a serious accident and jeopardize your rubber. I dread to think what the outcome would have been if we were driving at 65mph on a highway when the ringlet bound flew out. A whorl spring flying out of the auto is not caused by normal vesture and tear, it is a serious pattern flaw. I had a mechanic inspect the damage - i. The coil spring mount (a. 1000. A "jump perch") is made of sparse sheet metal and is poorly designed. It is spot welded onto the wheel well in 3 spots. This blueprint is too weak to support the weight of the automobile, and it broke off as a result. 2. New shock cushion, tire, wheel iii. Wheel alignment. Photographs and replaced parts available. Information technology was Tuesday, Jul. 12, 2022 when this rear suspension shock absorber consequence happened.

Encounter all issues of Mercedes Benz 420 and all Rear Intermission Shock Absorber problems of Mercedes Benz 420.

Rear Intermission Shock Cushion problem of Mercury Sable

The vehicle having this issue was a 2001 Mercury Sable. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the auto was 1MEHM55S21_. Drove ten hours from louisville kentucky to carlisle pennsylvania. Stopped at a holiday inn for the dark. No issues noted with the machine during the drive. When attempting to back up 2001 Mercury Sable in hotel parking lot, a grinding dissonance was heard coming from the right rear side of the vehicle. Tire was removed past aaa and the right rear pause spring curlicue was institute to be failed with a portion missing. The remaining stop of the coil had embedded itself into the inner wall of the right rear tire creating a gouge. The tire did not rupture. The car was towed to l. B. Smith Ford Lincoln Mercury located at 1100 market st. Lemoyne, PA 17043 (717) 697-2273 by aaa. The right rear coil bound was constitute to be broken. One (ane) function no. 4f1z*5560 was removed and replaced. 1 ast* shock absorber assembly was removed and replaced. 1 rear tire was removed and replaced with a 9007*1004552* p215/60r6 tire. The tire was mounted and balanced. All four wheels were aligned. Total charge for the repair past the dealership was $504. 47. It was 12/25/08 when this rear intermission shock absorber issue occurred.

See all problems of Mercury Sable and all Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problems of Mercury Sable.

Rear Intermission Shock Absorber trouble of Mercury Montego

The car is a 2006 Mercury Montego. Loud clunking from rear pause, replaced rear stupor and tightened torsion confined etc. Racket was reduced but never fully corrected. Consequently my car is out of alignment and ruined all 4 tires in just 32,000 miles. Service center is refusing to fix under warranty. They accept stated that the tires cupping on the inside has been an issue on these vehicles so is there more incorrect hither than they are saying. I have my car serviced there every 3,000 miles and tires rotated every half-dozen,000 miles. I pay them to take intendance of my car, if I would non take noticed my tires being cupped they would have never said anything. The failure date was Wednesday, March 26, 2008.

Meet all problems of Mercury Montego and all Rear Suspension Daze Absorber issues of Mercury Montego.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Mitsubishi Lancer

The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the car was JA3AU26U88_. I bought the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer ES a few weeks ago. Every fourth dimension I dorsum out of the driveway the front finish of the car 'bottoms out" and scrapes forth the pavement. I brought the car back to mark Mitsubishi. They checked out my car and although they admitted that the underside of the front of the car was scraped up the service counselor said everything "spec'd" out merely like the other new cars on the lot. I asked if the more than expensive versions of the 2008 Lancer had a ?beefed upward? interruption and was told; ? no all 2008 Lancer?south had the same break. ? I have since learned, from a review of the auto on auto mall USA that the gts model has ?firmer coil springs, shock absorbers and bushings and larger stabilizer bars than the DE and ES models. ? I took the service manager, nathan boisvert, for a test drive and backing out of any nearby driveway, even at 1 mile per hour the machine "bottomed out" equally the forepart tires rolled over the very small gutter that is mutual in residential neighborhoods in arizona. He said there was nothing the dealer could do other than report this to Mitsubishi since they did not have any "tech bulletins" on this result. Rather than admit this was a design defect he told me this was a "characteristic" of the car. He suggested I plough the wheel and dorsum out at a 45% bending so only 1 wheel at a time would go over the gutter and thereby avoid "bottoming out. " I called Mitsubishi customer help and opened a example [# 1-221800146]. They called me dorsum a day later and told me there was nothing wrong with my machine and they would not do annihilation. In the meantime I checked with nathan and he took another new 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer from the lot and information technology does the same thing. All I wanted was to accept it fixed. From my viewpoint it is obvious that the intermission is not stiff enough. I would think that Mitsubishi would desire to get in front of this and set the problem before information technology becomes a major recall but apparently they have there heads in the sand. This rear suspension shock cushion issue occurred Tuesday, August 21, 2007.

Meet all issues of Mitsubishi Lancer and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Mitsubishi Lancer.

Rear Pause Shock Absorber trouble of Nissan Xterra

The vehicle was a 2002 Nissan Xterra. The VIN of the problem Xterra is 5N1ED28YX2_. The vehicle left a couple large puddles while parked. Dealer identified the problem as a completely failed rear shock, due to corrosion, and recommended immediate replacement or risk diminished handling. At 37,500 mi, the 2002 model twelvemonth vehicle was no longer nether mill warranty so both rear shocks were replaced at owner's expense. This rear pause shock absorber problem happened on Tuesday, January 10, 2006.

Meet all issues of Nissan Xterra and all Rear Interruption Stupor Absorber problems of Nissan Xterra.

Rear Pause Shock Absorber trouble of SAAB 9-3

The vehicle is a 2003 SAAB 9-3. The VIN of this vehicle was YS3FD49Y63_. Car leased ix/23/03 and i week after a loud rattling/knocking noise starts up from right rear. To dealer 6 times for this problem. Right rear shock replaced twice and on 12/19/03 district SAAB rep concluded that noise comes from stupor and is a normal noise. I disagree and do not understand this explanation. Delearship will non make any more than attempts to gear up this rattling/knocking racket. Filed a complaint with SAAB customer service on 12/23/03 and have not heard from them. Am disappointed and upset that the dissonance tin not be located and fixed. Information technology was December. xix, 2003 when this rear intermission daze cushion issue happened.

See all problems of SAAB 9-3 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber issues of SAAB 9-3.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of SAAB 9-3

The vehicle was a 2001 SAAB ix-three convertible. The VIN of the car is YS3DF78K41_. This vehicle has been nil, but problems since day 1. The rims accept aptitude on two occasions, the rear struts had to be replaced, restriction fluid needed to exist added and the brake pads had to be replaced all within ane year of owning the vehicle. There is a grade action police force suite concernig the bicycle rims. Everytime the vehicle is driven we are fearful that the bicycle rims are going to bend over again. This causes problems on the wearable and tear of the tires as well. Likewise the fuel tank is linking fluid. This vehcile is a lemon. Information technology looks skillful, simply it is not safe. . The wheel trouble has caused the two front tires to wear out. This rear suspension shock absorber problem happened on Fri, July 5, 2002.

Come across all problems of SAAB nine-3 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of SAAB 9-3.

Rear Pause Stupor Absorber problem of Saturn VUE

The vehicle involved is a 2004 Saturn Vue. While driving the vehicle, the driver heard a loud "pop" from rear of automobile. Afterwards pulling over the driver saw that the top of the right rear wheel was tipped in. The auto was towed to a repair station. Information technology was determined that the right rear lateral link assembly broke. The mounting bolt broke causing the mounting flange to brake off of the frame. This action too acquired the frame to curve. It was necessary to supplant the frame, links, control artillery and shock absorber. Full cost to me was $1,900. 42. Saturn said they were non responsible and would not pay for any expenses. A think ( campaign #04067001 ) to replace the rear lateral links was performed on this vehicle on v/21/2005. Apparently, this retrieve piece of work was not effective. The driver was non speeding, did not hit a pot hole or other object. There was no accident involved, and no one was injured. These are not parts that require periodic maintenance or upkeep. The parts on this auto failed. The mechanic at the Chevrolet dealer that performed the piece of work said that all the bolts in that area were rusted and needed replaced. If this failure would take occurred on an interstate road going at a much faster rate of speed, I can't imagine the consequences. Thank you for your assistance. The failure engagement was Mar. 28, 2010.

Encounter all problems of Saturn VUE and all Rear Suspension Stupor Cushion problems of Saturn VUE.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Subaru Outback

The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was 4S4BP61CX6_. 2006 Subaru Outback 17,500+mi. 14 mos. Old rear struts [20365ag13a] have failed [leaked] vehicle is no longer safe to operate dealer & mfgr. Accept not identified problem request for faulty parts denied for warranty reasons. This rear pause stupor absorber issue occurred ten/08/07.

Encounter all problems of Subaru Outback and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Subaru Outback.

Rear Interruption Daze Cushion trouble of Subaru Outback

When driving my 2006 Subaru Outback ii. 5i at motorway speeds for xxx or more minutes, the rear shocks lose their dampening power due to overheating, and cause the vehicle's rear to bounce up and down uncontrolled. Over fifty-fifty the slightest dips in the route, the rearend will compress causing the vehicles break to shrink and striking crash-land stops. This has happened on several occasions in the by, and in my opinion, make the Outback hard to control. Subaru has inspected the vehicle, and stated it is per mill specs. The failure date was 03/01/08.

See all bug of Subaru Outback and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber bug of Subaru Outback.

Rear Break Shock Absorber problem of Suzuki One thousand Vitara

The vehicle having this outcome was a 2003 Suzuki Grand Vitara 40-7. The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) is JS3TD62V73_. The brakes are squeaking, and the technician cannot find the cause of the trouble. The brake pads were replaced and were withal squeaking. The front shocks were replaced, but the technician said the rear shocks non working well, and this was normal. Air conditioner (a/c) was not cooling. The vehicle does non feel safe anymore. This issue happened on Saturday, Mar. 22, 2003.

Run across all problems of Suzuki Thou Vitara and all Rear Pause Shock Absorber problems of Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion problem of Toyota RAV4

The machine is a 2007 Toyota Rav4. While driving car on highway, I heard a depression noise from the passenger side rear of the car that sounded similar something in the correct rear suspension broke. Since this time, the auto sounds similar something is loose and makes a knocking audio from the passenger side rear of the vehicle when driving between 10 mph and 30 mph when you go over modest bumps. It sounds similar a broken spring or shock absorber or some other component of the rear suspension system is loose or broken. I am concerned near driving the vehicle, or letting other family unit members drive the vehicle, particularly at high mode speeds. This rear interruption stupor absorber consequence occurred ten/06/2013.

Run into all problems of Toyota RAV4 and all Rear Interruption Shock Absorber problems of Toyota RAV4.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion problem of Toyota Camry

The car is a 2010 Toyota Camry. The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the auto was 4T4BF3EK9A_. Tire dealer informed me that left front and right rear struts were leaking and that all four should be replaced. Took motorcar to Toyota dealer (auto under extended warranty), where dealer said he would replace just left front strut, and that some leaking was acceptable (manufacturer's policy). Strut was replaced. Even so, wheels were not aligned, as is important whenever struts are replaced. Also, information technology's not good exercise to replace only 1 strut--no i replaces only 1 tire (or on older cars, one shock cushion) for the same reason--it can create a dangerous imbalance. Toyota'southward leaking strut policy needs to be investigated. It was Tue., May. 28, 2022 when this rear suspension daze absorber upshot occurred.

Encounter all problems of Toyota Camry and all Rear Interruption Daze Absorber problems of Toyota Camry.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber trouble of Volkswagen Touareg

The auto is a 2010 Volkswagen Touareg. The vehicle had a crash. Vehicle identification number (VIN): WVGFK7A90A_. A koni n America ("koni") shock absorber bent, which compromised safe vehicle handling, increasing the risk of a collision, causing a crash. These shock absorbers were purchased in April 2022 from neuspeed. The lacking absorbers were manufactured with an incorrectly welded bracket which caused the stupor absorber to catastrophically bend and residuum on the drive shaft, thereby compromising vehicle handling, increasing the run a risk of a crash. Koni model numbers: 8245 1146l 8241 1146r 8245 1147. It was December 17, 2022 when this rear intermission shock absorber issue happened.

See all problems of Volkswagen Touareg and all Rear Break Shock Cushion problems of Volkswagen Touareg.

Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber problem of Volkswagen Beetle

The vehicle identification number (VIN) of the auto was 3VWCS21C21_. I am will reinecke and will exist submitting this complaint on behalf of ms. Rossi. We have a 2001 Volkswagen Beetle with 15500 miles on information technology [the vehicle had 1220 miles on it when we bought it]. We noticed a noise coming from the rear of the machine that became increasingly worse. In as much as the car was out of warranty [12 months or 12000 miles], a friend and myself searched for the source of the noise that seemed to exist coming from both sides, rear of the vehicle. We found the crusade to be the rear daze absorber mountings. Within these mountings is a cobweb or neophrene gasket/grommet that was almost completely disindegraded in both mountings. When we removed each shock nosotros discovered an orange dust/crumb like substance on the shaft. Further investigation led us to what was left of these gaskets embodied within the mountings. I have the remains of these gaskets along with the nibble similar residue in my possession and volition gladly send it to you should you then want. I contacted the Volkswagen dealer as well every bit their customer care center and received no help at all with this problem. I feel as though it is an engineering flaw that something like this could occur on a vehicle with only 15500 miles on information technology that is mainly driven within a retirement community by a senior denizen. The failure appointment was 08/23/2003.

Run into all problems of Volkswagen Beetle and all Rear Interruption Stupor Absorber problems of Volkswagen Protrude.

Rear Interruption Shock Absorber problem of Volvo XC70

The vehicle having this issue was a 2002 Volvo Xc70. My wife narrowly missed having an accident on March 31, 2010 and doing more than damage to our 2002 Xc70 Volvo with 53,770 miles (bought new). She was stopping when she heard strange noises from the front left side. The commuter front end daze cushion spring broke just equally she stopped. She could have had a bad blow had she been driving at expressway or normal speed. Dealership replaced the shock absorber bound subsequently the auto was flatbed transported to them but they, Volvo USA, and Volvo sweden said "you pay all costs - the machine is out of warranty and the part is non covered. " the car has not been common salt water submerged, or hit potholes that damaged the tire or rim. It is driven but on paved , non washboard roads a car suddenly pulling to 1 side can and has caused mild injury to decease accidents. If the wife didn't throw the bound out - information technology is however available. This rear suspension stupor cushion issue occurred Wednesday, March 31, 2010.

Run into all problems of Volvo XC70 and all Rear Intermission Shock Absorber problems of Volvo XC70.

Rear Suspension Daze Absorber problem of Volvo V70

The car was a 2001 Volvo V70. Front passenger side wheel broke off as a result of brawl joint breaking leading to an beam intermission. Also damaged were bumper and fender when hitting by the bike breaking off. My married woman was leaving o'hare airport at around 9:00 pm on 6/27/06. When cruising at 20-30 mph she heard a cracking dissonance and then all of a sudden the car turned right. She stepped on a restriction pedal trying non to hitting cars on the next line. When she stopped and exit of the car she realized that the front passenger side wheel came off. Information technology was kept in place just by the shock absorber. She and my two sons (age iii and vi) spent virtually two hours on a highway waiting for a tow truck to come. The car has v years and 98,500 miles on it. The front interruption was already repaired twice. In one case two years ago and so half a year later on that. Before the accident described above at that place were no signals/noises that would indicate any problems with neither the wheel nor the pause. The car was always driven on normal streets and highways. No off route adventures or really bad roads. I had many cars in my life but I've never had such a problem before. How tin can Volvo claim that they brand reliable and rubber cars when something like that happens? I sent an e-mail to Volvo client service simply have not heard dorsum from them. Now I have to pay over $2,500 in repair fees ($1000 to repair broken ball articulation and beam plus additional $1500 to repair bumper and fender). I exercise have an extended warranty but, surprise surprise, they said they can simply cover the toll of repairing the ball joint. Everything else, even though it was damaged because of the ball articulation, they would not embrace. And, of class, the cost of replacing the ball joint is less than my deductible so . . . They washed their hands. This rear suspension shock absorber problem happened on June 27, 2006.

See all bug of Volvo V70 and all Rear Suspension Stupor Cushion problems of Volvo V70.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber trouble of Audi RS4

The car was a 2007 Audi Rs4. The vehicle identification number (VIN) is WUARU78E17_. Suspension component failure leading to leaking daze absorber. Problem acknowledged by Audi as a known design defect and shocks replaced under their campaign, "43a9 dynamic ride control pause service". Later on new shocks the car does not track center, pulling to right at highway speeds and erratic swaying/shimmying over uneven pavement. Steering and suspension feels loose and nervous at highway speeds; causing frequent lane excursions. Audi denies any defect in "improved shocks" or in replacement process (ie no suspension alignment included). Audi proposes that the consumer pays for an alignment job out-of-pocket. It was 08/04/x when this rear pause shock cushion issue happened.

Run into all bug of Audi RS4 and all Rear Intermission Shock Absorber issues of Audi RS4.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion problem of Audi RS6

The vehicle having this issue was a 2003 Audi Rs6. The VIN of the problem Rs6 is WUAPV64B13_. Failure of the suspension organisation, yielding erratic beliefs of the vehicle over bumps and depressions. The vehicle is equipped with a organization called "dynamic ride control" (aka drc) which is a fluid-filled organization to control shock absorber movements, merely the shocks leak the fluid resulting in failure of the suspension organization as designed to perform. This rear suspension shock absorber outcome occurred Thursday, May. 25, 2006.

See all bug of Audi RS6 and all Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problems of Audi RS6.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of BMW 530

The vehicle was a 2006 BMW 530xi. In Baronial 2022, the station wagon appeared to lower itself in the rear little past petty. As of this filing, the rear cease has lowered itself to the signal information technology causes dangerous driving and there is no shock absorption or interruption on the rear of the vehicle. The front appears to be fine. In June 2006, in that location was a recall campaign for rear stupor absorbers nether 06v-277 for 2006 BMW 5. half dozen & 7 serial for vehicles manufactured from January 5, 2006-Apr 26, 2006. My vehicle, per BMW, was manufactured in may 2005. I am alleging my vehicle handling and command is impaired due to the defect associated with the shock absorbers and the inclusive manufacturing dates should include all 2006 Bmws. The dealer and BMW is neglecting to accost the effect based on a technicality on the inclusive manufactured dates. Delight investigate an expansion to the inclusion. The failure date was 08/xxx/2013.

See all issues of BMW 530 and all Rear Intermission Stupor Absorber problems of BMW 530.

Rear Pause Shock Absorber problem of BMW 750

The vehicle's vehicle identification number (VIN) was WBAHN835X6_. The owner has a 2006 BMW 750li. The contact stated that the rear stop of the vehicle dropped so far downward that it could no longer be driven. The contact found a recall associated with NHTSA campaign id number 06v277000 (suspension: rear shock absorber), but was informed past the manufacturer that the vehicle was non included in the retrieve. The failure mileage was ninety,000 and the current mileage was 100,000. This problem occurred on Monday, September five, 2022.

See all problems of BMW 750 and all Rear Suspension Daze Absorber problems of BMW 750.

Rear Suspension Stupor Absorber trouble of Buick Lesabre

The vehicle is a 2001 Buick Lesabre. Rear shock absorbers allows the vehicle'southward rear wheels to leave the pavement. While driving 60-70 mph and hitting rough or uneven pavement, the rear of the auto seemed to skid out of control like it was hitting a patch of ice. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic who found fluid in the air bag of the rear shock absorbers. The rear shock were replaced with monroe shocks. This outcome happened on 01/01/1901.

Run into all issues of Buick Lesabre and all Rear Suspension Daze Cushion bug of Buick Lesabre.

Rear Interruption Shock Absorber problem of Buick Lesabre

The vehicle having this effect was a 1999 Buick Lesabre. The VIN of the problem Lesabre is 1G4HP52K6X_. Shocks in rear of vehicle are unstable. This causes the vehicle to bounce up & down, even with people in the front & the back. Would even accept luggage in the truck & vehicle would bounce. Would have a decision-making problem if not slowing down. Took vehicle to dealer & was informed by mechanic that trouble is normal. This rear suspension shock cushion outcome occurred November. 1, 1999.

See all problems of Buick Lesabre and all Rear Intermission Shock Absorber problems of Buick Lesabre.

Rear Suspension Shock Absorber problem of Cadillac STS

The vehicle identification number (VIN) of this Cadillac Sts is 1G6DC67A15_. The reporting person's vehicle is a 2004 Cadillac Sts. The contact stated that he heard a loud sound on the rear rider side. The vehicle was taken to a local repair shop who diagnosed that the shock absorber was defective and needed to be replaced. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure who did not offer whatsoever assistance since the vehicle was not included in any recalls. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileage was 83,500. It was 06/06/eleven when this rear suspension shock cushion issue happened.

See all problems of Cadillac STS and all Rear Suspension Stupor Cushion problems of Cadillac STS.

Rear Suspension Shock Cushion trouble of Cadillac SRX

The vehicle'south vehicle identification number (VIN) was 1GYEE63A25_. The reporting person'southward vehicle is a 2005 Cadillac Srx. The contact stated that the shock absorber was not functioning properly, causing the vehicle to bounce upwards and down when traveling. At 40,000 miles, the contact stated that the service suspension system indicator illuminated on the instrument panel intermittently. The dealer brash the contact that the electronic suspension command module was corroded and needed to be replaced. The manufacturer offered to pay half of the repair price. The electric current mileage was 80,000 and the failure mileage was forty,000. It was 04/01/2008 when this rear suspension shock absorber result happened.

See all problems of Cadillac SRX and all Rear Pause Shock Cushion problems of Cadillac SRX.